From: Ilya Leoshkevich <i...@linux.ibm.com>
[ Upstream commit 806ce6e2117a42528e7bb979e04e28229b34a612 ]
test_cgroup_storage fails on s390 with an assertion failure: packets are
dropped when they shouldn't. The problem is that BPF_DW packet count is
accessed as BPF_W with an offset of 0, which is not correct on
big-endian machines.
Since the point of this test is not to verify narrow loads/stores,
simply use BPF_DW when working with packet counts.
Fixes: 68cfa3ac6b8d ("selftests/bpf: add a cgroup storage test")
Fixes: 919646d2a3a9 ("selftests/bpf: extend the storage test to test per-cpu
cgroup storage")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <i...@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c
index 2fc4625c1a150..6557290043911 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c
@@ -20,9 +20,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), /* flags, not used */
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
BPF_FUNC_get_local_storage),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, 0x1),
- BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 0),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 0),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), /* map fd */
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), /* flags, not used */
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
BPF_FUNC_get_local_storage),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 1),
BPF_STX_XADD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, 0x1),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
--
2.20.1
