Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions

[Mark Hahn]

> I personaly do not trust the 2.4.x kernel entirely yet, and would prefer to
...
> afraid that this may partialy criple 2.2 driver development.

egads!  how can there be "development" on a *stable* kernel line?

maybe this is the time to reconsider terminology/policy:
does "stable" mean "bugfixes only"?  
or does it mean "development kernel for conservatives"?

me, I've run the "progressive" kernel line on production boxes since ~2.3.36.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/