On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 22:47, Denis Efremov <efre...@linux.com> wrote:
>
> Use define PCI_STD_NUM_BARS instead of PCI_ROM_RESOURCE for the number of
> PCI BARs.
>
> Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevit...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alex Dubov <oa...@yahoo.com>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hans...@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efre...@linux.com>

Assuming this depends on other changes in the series? Thus this is
probably for PCI maintainers to pick up?

Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hans...@linaro.org>

Kind regards
Uffe

> ---
>  drivers/memstick/host/jmb38x_ms.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memstick/host/jmb38x_ms.c 
> b/drivers/memstick/host/jmb38x_ms.c
> index 32747425297d..fd281c1d39b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/memstick/host/jmb38x_ms.c
> +++ b/drivers/memstick/host/jmb38x_ms.c
> @@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ static int jmb38x_ms_count_slots(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
>         int cnt, rc = 0;
>
> -       for (cnt = 0; cnt < PCI_ROM_RESOURCE; ++cnt) {
> +       for (cnt = 0; cnt < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; ++cnt) {
>                 if (!(IORESOURCE_MEM & pci_resource_flags(pdev, cnt)))
>                         break;
>
> --
> 2.21.0
>

Reply via email to