On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 04:53:16PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>
>
> Add host operation ->set_dma_mask() so that drivers can define their own
> DMA masks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <tred...@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleots...@gmail.com>
Ran a boot test with both patches on a Tegra186 board.
Thanks!
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 12 ++++--------
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index a5dc5aae973e..bc04c3180477 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -3756,18 +3756,14 @@ int sdhci_setup_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
> host->flags &= ~SDHCI_USE_ADMA;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * It is assumed that a 64-bit capable device has set a 64-bit DMA mask
> - * and *must* do 64-bit DMA. A driver has the opportunity to change
> - * that during the first call to ->enable_dma(). Similarly
> - * SDHCI_QUIRK2_BROKEN_64_BIT_DMA must be left to the drivers to
> - * implement.
> - */
> if (sdhci_can_64bit_dma(host))
> host->flags |= SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA;
>
> if (host->flags & (SDHCI_USE_SDMA | SDHCI_USE_ADMA)) {
> - ret = sdhci_set_dma_mask(host);
> + if (host->ops->set_dma_mask)
> + ret = host->ops->set_dma_mask(host);
> + else
> + ret = sdhci_set_dma_mask(host);
>
> if (!ret && host->ops->enable_dma)
> ret = host->ops->enable_dma(host);
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> index 902f855efe8f..8285498c0d8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> @@ -622,6 +622,7 @@ struct sdhci_ops {
>
> u32 (*irq)(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask);
>
> + int (*set_dma_mask)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> int (*enable_dma)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> unsigned int (*get_max_clock)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> unsigned int (*get_min_clock)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> --
> 2.23.0
>
