From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-ci...@xs4all.nl>

[ Upstream commit 14d5511691e5290103bc480998bc322e68f139d4 ]

If cec_notifier_cec_adap_unregister() is called before
cec_unregister_adapter() then everything is OK (and this is the
case today). But if it is the other way around, then
cec_notifier_unregister() is called first, and that doesn't
set n->cec_adap to NULL.

So if e.g. cec_notifier_set_phys_addr() is called after
cec_notifier_unregister() but before cec_unregister_adapter()
then n->cec_adap points to an unregistered and likely deleted
cec adapter. So just set n->cec_adap->notifier and n->cec_adap
to NULL for rubustness.

Eventually cec_notifier_unregister will disappear and this will
be simplified substantially.

Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-ci...@xs4all.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+sams...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/media/cec/cec-notifier.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/media/cec/cec-notifier.c b/drivers/media/cec/cec-notifier.c
index 9598c7778871a..c4aa27e0c4308 100644
--- a/drivers/media/cec/cec-notifier.c
+++ b/drivers/media/cec/cec-notifier.c
@@ -124,6 +124,8 @@ void cec_notifier_unregister(struct cec_notifier *n)
 {
        mutex_lock(&n->lock);
        n->callback = NULL;
+       n->cec_adap->notifier = NULL;
+       n->cec_adap = NULL;
        mutex_unlock(&n->lock);
        cec_notifier_put(n);
 }
-- 
2.20.1

Reply via email to