On 9/25/07, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:39:07 +1000 hce wrote: > > > On 9/24/07, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:40:07 +1000 hce wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Randy. > > > > > > > > On 9/24/07, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:52:36 +1000 hce wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I am upgrading from kernel 2.6.11 to 2.6.22 on ARM S3C2400A and > > > > > > found > > > > > > a following issue on 2.6.22. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2.6.11, I selected CONFIG_ISA, CONFIG_NET_PCI and CONFIG_CS89X0 > > > > > > to > > > > > > build CS8900A Ethernet driver to kernel, it was running perfect. > > > > > > > > > > > > But on 2.6.22, I made the same configuration for CS8900A, the > > > > > > cs89x0.o > > > > > > could not be compiled in to the kernel (or as a module when I tried > > > > > > to > > > > > > CONFIG_CS89X0=m) unless I commented out depends statement in > > > > > > drivers/net/Kconfig. I double checked all three are CONFIG_ISA=y, > > > > > > CONFIG_NET_PCI=y and CONFIG_CS89X0=y. Any explanation please, was I > > > > > > missing something here? > > > > > > > > > > I didn't look in 2.6.11 Kconfig files, but in 2.6.22, this driver is > > > > > limited to 3 specific boards: > > > > > > > > > > config CS89x0 > > > > > tristate "CS89x0 support" > > > > > depends on NET_PCI && (ISA || MACH_IXDP2351 || ARCH_IXDP2X01 > > > > > || ARCH_PNX010X) > > > > > > > > The Kconfig for CS89x0 in 2.6.11 is exactly the same as 2.6.22. > > > > > > > > > Does ARM S3C2400A qualify as any of those? (MACH_... or ARCH_...) > > > > > > > > I can run CS89x0 for ARM S3C2400 in 2.6.11, at least I can say yes, > > > > the ARM S3C2400A qualifies those in 2.6.11, I don't know the 2.6.22 > > > > and I hope someone knows 2.6.22 well can answer it. > > > > > > > > > (latter: ARCH_PNX010X is not used anywhere else AFAICT) > > > > > > > > Yes, but you only need to enable ISA and NET_PCI to use CS89x0. > > > > > > Right. > > > > > > I don't have any problem building CS89x0 for X86_32: > > > make defconfig then enable ISA (what!?!? why not in defconfig?) > > > and then enable CS89x0. > > > > I don't have my embedded system here, I'll try when I get there. But, > > let me clarify it, did you mean to type "make defconfig" on linux > > (kernel) directory, and enable ISA, NET_PCI and CS89x0 from the > > prompt? > > > > My procedure was to edit .config to enable ISA, NET_PCI and CS89x0 > > from vim, then type "make menuconfig" and "make oldconfig" (The same > > procedure I did in 2.6.11 which works fine). Does that make things > > differently? > > You should do "make oldconfig" immediately after editing the .config > file (AFAIK). Or the "make menuconfig" might run the oldconfig > changes for you.
Sorry, I was not clear. The procedure was actually I type "make ARCH=arm menuconfig" first, then I could not find the CONFIG_ISA, CONFIG_NET_SPI and CONFIG_CS89x0 on config screen, this is still puzzles me why could "make menuconfig" displays all possible configurations on 2.6.22? Could you please explain? Because I was not able to add CONFIG_ISA, CONFIG_NET_SPI and CONFIG_CS89x0 from "make menuconfig", I used vim to manually added those and then "make oldconfig". > Then I would just double-check the final .config file > to make sure that it contains what you expect it to contain. Yes, I did double-check with the .config file, all three are =y. Thanks Randy. Regards, Jim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
