On 2019-09-25 05:39, Daniel Wagner wrote: > So I after starring on the code I am not sure if the WARN_ON_ONCE is > correct. It assumes that after processing one status continuation, > there is no more work. Though it looks like there is another element > to process. Is it possible that two sense continuation are possible?
According to the firmware documentation it is possible that multiple status continuations are emitted by the firmware. Do you want to submit a patch or do you prefer that I do this myself? Thanks, Bart.
