On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 08:23:24PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > As has been seen recently, binding the buffer allocation and tpm_buf > together is sometimes far from optimal. The buffer might come from the > caller namely when tpm_send() is used by another subsystem. In addition we > can stability in call sites w/o rollback (e.g. power events)> > > Take allocation out of the tpm_buf framework and make it purely a wrapper > for the data buffer. > > Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11146585/ > Cc: Mimi Zohar <zo...@linux.ibm.com> > Cc: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnit...@redhat.com> > Cc: James Bottomley <james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> > Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.g...@linaro.org> > Cc: Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com> > --- > v2: > * In tpm2_get_random(), TPM2_CC_GET_RANDOM was accidently switch to > TPM2_CC_PCR_EXTEND. Now it has been switched back. Forgot --subject-prefix="PATCH v2".
/Jarkko
