Hi,

bug is still present in 5.4-rc1

dmesg prints this line and at least switch is not inialized on bananapi-r2

mt6397 1000d000.pwrap:mt6323: unsupported chip: 0x0

regards Frank


> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. August 2019 um 08:24 Uhr
> Von: "Hsin-hsiung Wang" <hsin-hsiung.w...@mediatek.com>
> An: "Frank Wunderlich" <fran...@public-files.de>, "Matthias Brugger" 
> <matthias....@gmail.com>
> Cc: linux-media...@lists.infradead.org, "Mark Rutland" 
> <mark.rutl...@arm.com>, "Alessandro Zummo" <a.zu...@towertech.it>, "Alexandre 
> Belloni" <alexandre.bell...@bootlin.com>, srv_heupstr...@mediatek.com, 
> devicet...@vger.kernel.org, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" 
> <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>, "Sean Wang" <sean.w...@mediatek.com>, "Liam 
> Girdwood" <lgirdw...@gmail.com>, "Rob Herring" <robh...@kernel.org>, 
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Richard Fontana" <rfont...@redhat.com>, "Mark 
> Brown" <broo...@kernel.org>, linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org, "René van 
> Dorst" <opensou...@vdorst.com>, "Thomas Gleixner" <t...@linutronix.de>, 
> "Eddie Huang" <eddie.hu...@mediatek.com>, "Lee Jones" <lee.jo...@linaro.org>, 
> "Kate Stewart" <kstew...@linuxfoundation.org>, linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: [BUG] [PATCH v5 02/10] mfd: mt6397: extract irq related 
> code from core driver
>
> Hi Frank/Matthias,
> 
> On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 19:16 +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > > Gesendet: Freitag, 23. August 2019 um 17:42 Uhr
> > > Von: "Matthias Brugger" <matthias....@gmail.com>
> > 
> > > I suppose that's because 3/10 has code that should be in 2/10 and for some
> > > reason 3/10 was not pushed for linux-next inclusion. Although it has the 
> > > same
> > > Acked-for-mfd-by tag.
> > >
> > > @Frank, can you test if adding 3/10 to your code base fixes the issue?
> > 
> > adding part 3 [1] seems to fix the issue too
> > 
> > [    4.960051] mt6323-regulator mt6323-regulator: Chip ID = 0x2023
> > 
> > thanks
> > 
> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11110509/
> Thanks for your comments.
> The root cause seems I didn't split the code well.
> I will fix it in the next version.
> 
>

Reply via email to