On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 5:29 AM Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 18:29:37 +0100
> Rob Herring <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 16:08:31 +0300, Mircea Caprioru wrote:
> > > This patch add device tree binding documentation for AD7192 adc in YAML
> > > format.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mircea Caprioru <[email protected]>
> It seems that I messed up before and didn't actually revert the v3 patch.
>
> I'll roll a small fix patch to bring the tree inline with this and send out 
> to the
> list.
>
> Sorry about this. One of many things that went wrong in that last pull 
> request!

This still has dtc and schema errors:

 DTC     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7192.example.dt.yaml
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7192.example.dts:20.13-23:
Warning (reg_format): /example-0/spi0/adc@0:reg: property has invalid
length (4 bytes) (#address-cells == 2, #size-cells == 1)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7192.example.dt.yaml:
Warning (pci_device_bus_num): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7192.example.dt.yaml:
Warning (i2c_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7192.example.dt.yaml:
Warning (spi_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7192.example.dts:18.17-36.15:
Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /example-0/spi0/adc@0: Relying on
default #address-cells value
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7192.example.dts:18.17-36.15:
Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /example-0/spi0/adc@0: Relying on
default #size-cells value
  CHECK   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7192.example.dt.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7192.example.dt.yaml:
adc@0: avdd-supply:0: 'avdd' was expected
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7192.example.dt.yaml:
adc@0: dvdd-supply:0: 'dvdd' was expected

Reply via email to