On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:31:02 +0100 (BST) Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would that waste a little memory? I think not with SLUB, > but perhaps with SLOB, which packs a little tighter. >
maybe just depends on the amount of used anon_vma and page_mapping_info etc... I don't think a system which uses SLOB consumes such structs so much as that memory-for-alignment is considered as "waste" of memory. Anyway, I decided to go ahead with current container-info-per-page implementation. If the size of page struct is problem at mainline inclusion discussion, I'll be back. Thanks, -Kame - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
