On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 11:29:11AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]> > > Some time ago I started a discussion about the need for a proper early device > probing mechanism[1]. One that would be based on real platform drivers and > support both platform data and device tree. > > While we're far from reaching any consensus on the implementation, Arnd > suggested that I start off by moving the SuperH-specific early platform > drivers implementation to arch/sh[2]. > > This series is the first attempt at making way for a new, less hacky > implementation. > > The first patch moves all the early_platform code to arch/sh. > > The second patch prefixes all early_platform symbols with 'sh_'. > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/26/657 > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/27/239 > > v1 -> v2: > - certain drivers are compiled for arm/mach-shmobile too - we need to > add ifdefs for CONFIG_SUPERH around early_platform calls > > v2 -> v3: > - added a stub for is_early_platform_device() which always returns false > on non-SuperH architectures > > v3 -> v4: > - rebased on top of v5.4-rc1 > - removed patches that are already upstream from the series > > Bartosz Golaszewski (2): > drivers: move the early platform device support to arch/sh > sh: add the sh_ prefix to early platform symbols
I like this, any objection from anyone if I take this in my driver-core tree for 5.5-rc1? thanks, greg k-h
