On Fri, 2019-10-04 at 18:16 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > Is there any harm of also having the 'generation' exposed > > as well? I like the simplicity of the mapping from that value to > > Thunderbolt/USB4 standard version (e.g. I would show that in > > 'boltctl > > list'); 'hw_version' will need a bit more "interpreting". > > If generation is the only thing you need, we can export that now and > forget hw_version :) Sounds good to me, that is should indeed be good enough for bolt.
- RE: [RFC PATCH 17/22] thunderbolt: Add initial support f... Mario.Limonciello
- Re: [RFC PATCH 17/22] thunderbolt: Add initial supp... Mika Westerberg
- Re: [RFC PATCH 17/22] thunderbolt: Add initial ... Yehezkel Bernat
- Re: [RFC PATCH 17/22] thunderbolt: Add init... Mika Westerberg
- Re: [RFC PATCH 17/22] thunderbolt: Add ... Yehezkel Bernat
- RE: [RFC PATCH 17/22] thunderbolt:... Mario.Limonciello
- Re: [RFC PATCH 17/22] thunderb... Mika Westerberg
- Re: [RFC PATCH 17/22] thun... Mika Westerberg
- Re: [RFC PATCH 17/22] thun... Christian Kellner
- RE: [RFC PATCH 17/22] thunderb... Mario.Limonciello