On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 08:14:25AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 10/4/19 7:59 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> @@ -123,7 +125,8 @@ __visible bool ex_handler_uaccess(const struct > >> exception_table_entry *fixup, > >> unsigned long error_code, > >> unsigned long fault_addr) > >> { > >> - WARN_ONCE(trapnr == X86_TRAP_GP, "General protection fault in user > >> access. Non-canonical address?"); > >> + WARN_ONCE(trapnr == X86_TRAP_GP, "General protection fault at %s > >> address in user access.", > >> + is_canonical_addr(fault_addr) ? "canonical" : > >> "non-canonical"); > > Unless the hardware behaves rather differently from the way I think it > > does, fault_addr is garbage for anything other than #PF and sometimes > > for #DF. (And maybe the virtualization faults?) I don't believe that > > #GP fills in CR2. > > For #GP, we do: > > do_general_protection(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code) > { > ... > if (!user_mode(regs)) { > if (fixup_exception(regs, X86_TRAP_GP, error_code, 0)) > return; > > Where the 0 is 'fault_addr'. I'm not sure any other way that > ex_handler_uaccess() can get called with trapnr == X86_TRAP_GP. 0 is > canonical last I checked, which would make this patch a bit academic. :) My fault. I thought the 'fault_addr' is filled with a valid value. So we really don't know the answer without decoding the instruction which causes this #GP. :)
-- Cheers, Changbin Du