On Thu 26-09-19 16:34:08, Chengguang Xu wrote:
> It is meaningless to increase DQST_LOOKUPS number while iterating
> over dirty/inuse list, so just avoid it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu...@zoho.com.cn>
Yeah, makes sense. I've queued up your patch. Thanks!
Honza
> ---
> fs/quota/dquot.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/quota/dquot.c b/fs/quota/dquot.c
> index 6e826b454082..00a3c6df2ea3 100644
> --- a/fs/quota/dquot.c
> +++ b/fs/quota/dquot.c
> @@ -595,7 +595,6 @@ int dquot_scan_active(struct super_block *sb,
> /* Now we have active dquot so we can just increase use count */
> atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count);
> spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
> - dqstats_inc(DQST_LOOKUPS);
> dqput(old_dquot);
> old_dquot = dquot;
> /*
> @@ -649,7 +648,6 @@ int dquot_writeback_dquots(struct super_block *sb, int
> type)
> * use count */
> dqgrab(dquot);
> spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
> - dqstats_inc(DQST_LOOKUPS);
> err = sb->dq_op->write_dquot(dquot);
> if (err) {
> /*
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
>
>
--
Jan Kara <j...@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
