Hi Dave,
thanks for your review!
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 08:30:51AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 10/7/19 8:16 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > @@ -318,7 +328,7 @@ static void dump_pagetable(unsigned long address)
> >
> > #else /* CONFIG_X86_64: */
> >
> > -void vmalloc_sync_all(void)
> > +void vmalloc_sync_mappings(void)
> > {
> > sync_global_pgds(VMALLOC_START & PGDIR_MASK, VMALLOC_END);
> > }
>
> FWIW, I generally detest the use of __weak. :)
Yeah, I don't like it either, but in this case it is probably better
than empty stubs in all architectures besides x86 :)
> In this case, it ends up letting us gloss over the fact that we have a
> 32/64-bit asymmetry. It would probably be nice to actually have a
> 64-bit implementation that comes along with a nice comment. Maybe this
> in vmalloc_sync_mappings():
>
> /*
> * 64-bit mappings might allocate new p4d/pud pages
> * that need to be propagated to all tasks' PGDs.
> */
>
> which would pair nicely with:
>
> void vmalloc_sync_unmappings(void)
> {
> /*
> * Unmappings never allocate or free p4d/pud pages.
> * No work is required here.
> */
> }
Yes, that makes, I will add these comments in V2.
Thanks,
Joerg
