Hi Thor, On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 01:06:51PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote: > Hi Moritz, > > On 9/27/19 1:23 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote: > > Thor, > > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 09:32:11AM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote: > > > Hi Kedar & Moritz, > > > > > > On 9/27/19 12:13 AM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote: > > > > Hi Alan, > > > > > > > > Did you get a chance to send your framework changes to upstream? > > No they weren't upstreamed. > > > > > > @Moritz Fischer: If Alan couldn't send his patch series, Can we take > > > > this patch series?? > > > > Please let me know your thoughts on this. > > > > Alan had some comments RE: #defines, I'll have to take another look. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Kedar. > > > > > > > > > I'd like to see some mechanism added as well. Our CvP driver needs a way > > > to > > > load images to the FPGA over the PCIe bus. > > > > Can you elaborate a bit on the CvP use-case and how that would work? Who > > would use the device how after loading the bitstream? > > > > Generally there are several use cases that I have collected mentally > > over the years: > > > > I) DFL use case: > > - Mixed-set of drivers: Kernel and Userspace > > - FPGA logic is discoverable through DFL > > - Userspace application wants to reprogram FPGA > > > > II) DT configfs use case: > > - Mixed-set of drivers: Kernel and Userspace > > - FPGA logic is *not* discoverable (hence DT overlay) > > - Userspace application wants to reprogram FPGA > > > > III) Thomas' case: > > - Kernel only drivers (pcie bridge, pcie drivers, ...) > > - FPGA logic is fully discoverable (i.e. PCIe endpoint > > implemented in FPGA, connected to SoC via PCIe) > > - Userspace application wants to reprogram FPGA > > > > IV) VFIO case: > > - Usually exposes either entire device via vfio-pci or part via > > vfio-mdev > > - Loading (basic) bitstream at boot from flash > > - vfio-mdev case can use FPGA region interface + ioctl > > - Full VFIO case is similar to III) > > > > How does your CvP use case fit in? Collecting all the use-cases would > > help with moving forward on coming up with an API :) > > > The CvP case is the same as III) Thomas' case. The FPGA configuration > bitstream is downloaded over the PCIe. > > The one difference in my case is that there isn't an SoC. This is a Intel > host processor connecting to a non-SoC Stratix10/Arria10. The non-SoC > A10/S10, boots a minimal image (CvP) setting up the peripheral pins and > enabling the PCIe endpoint for CvP downloads. > > The host can then download bitstreams using the FPGA Manager through debugFS > and when the bitstream finishes downloading and the FPGA enters User Mode, > the functionality is available for the host to use.
I am generally confused by this driver. How does it work exactly? What happens after altera-cvp binds a PCI device? You can use it to download a bitstream (say we had the debugfs interface), and then what happens next? How do I use the device? It already has a PCI driver bound to it at that point? What happens next? Please tell me that not the only use-case for this is /dev/mem :) Thomas' use-case is different in that behind the FPGA device there are actual other *discoverable* PCI devices that will get enumerated and bind to separate drivers. Thanks, Moritz PS: I'll be out this week on vacation starting tmr so responses might be delayed