On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 01:01:40PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> "mask_ofl_ipi" is used for iterate CPUs which IPIs are needed to send
> to, however in the IPI sending loop, "mask_ofl_ipi" along with another
> variable "mask_ofl_test" might also get modified to record which CPU's
> quiesent state can be reported by sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus(). Two
> variables seems to be redundant for such a propose, so this patch clean
> things a little by solely using "mask_ofl_test" for recording and
> "mask_ofl_ipi" for iteration. This would improve the readibility of the
> IPI sending loop in sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.f...@gmail.com>

Queued for further review and testing, thank you!!!

                                                        Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 13 ++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> index 69c5aa64fcfd..212470018752 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> @@ -387,10 +387,10 @@ static void sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus(struct 
> work_struct *wp)
>               }
>               ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, rcu_exp_handler, NULL, 0);
>               put_cpu();
> -             if (!ret) {
> -                     mask_ofl_ipi &= ~mask;
> +             /* The CPU responses the IPI, and will report QS itself */
> +             if (!ret)
>                       continue;
> -             }
> +
>               /* Failed, raced with CPU hotplug operation. */
>               raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
>               if ((rnp->qsmaskinitnext & mask) &&
> @@ -401,13 +401,12 @@ static void sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus(struct 
> work_struct *wp)
>                       schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
>                       goto retry_ipi;
>               }
> -             /* CPU really is offline, so we can ignore it. */
> -             if (!(rnp->expmask & mask))
> -                     mask_ofl_ipi &= ~mask;
> +             /* CPU really is offline, and we need its QS to pass GP. */
> +             if (rnp->expmask & mask)
> +                     mask_ofl_test |= mask;
>               raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
>       }
>       /* Report quiescent states for those that went offline. */
> -     mask_ofl_test |= mask_ofl_ipi;
>       if (mask_ofl_test)
>               rcu_report_exp_cpu_mult(rnp, mask_ofl_test, false);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.23.0
> 

Reply via email to