> Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 12/24] x86/sgx: Linux Enclave Driver
Title needs a verb: "Add a Linux ... " On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 05:26:43PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > Intel Software Guard eXtensions (SGX) is a set of CPU instructions that > can be used by applications to set aside private regions of code and > data. The code outside the SGX hosted software entity is disallowed to > access the memory inside the enclave enforced by the CPU. We call these > entities as enclaves. > > This commit implements a driver that provides an ioctl API to construct > and run enclaves. Enclaves are constructed from pages residing in > reserved physical memory areas. The contents of these pages can only be > accessed when they are mapped as part of an enclave, by a hardware > thread running inside the enclave. > > The starting state of an enclave consists of a fixed measured set of > pages that are copied to the EPC during the construction process by > using ENCLS leaf functions and Software Enclave Control Structure (SECS) > that defines the enclave properties. > > Enclave are constructed by using ENCLS leaf functions ECREATE, EADD and > EINIT. ECREATE initializes SECS, EADD copies pages from system memory to > the EPC and EINIT check a given signed measurement and moves the enclave > into a state ready for execution. > > An initialized enclave can only be accessed through special Thread Control > Structure (TCS) pages by using ENCLU (ring-3 only) leaf EENTER. This leaf > function converts a thread into enclave mode and continues the execution in > the offset defined by the TCS provided to EENTER. An enclave is exited > through syscall, exception, interrupts or by explicitly calling another > ENCLU leaf EEXIT. > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]> > Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> > Co-developed-by: Serge Ayoun <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Serge Ayoun <[email protected]> > Co-developed-by: Shay Katz-zamir <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Shay Katz-zamir <[email protected]> > Co-developed-by: Suresh Siddha <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <[email protected]> > --- > Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst | 1 + > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sgx.h | 55 +++ > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sgx_errno.h | 2 +- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/Makefile | 6 +- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.c | 251 +++++++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.h | 37 ++ > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c | 365 +++++++++++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h | 100 +++++ > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c | 612 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c | 25 +- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/reclaim.c | 2 +- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h | 1 + > 12 files changed, 1444 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) That's a fat one. :) > create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sgx.h > create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.c > create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.h > create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c > create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h > create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c > > diff --git a/Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst > b/Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst > index 7f8dcae7a230..83df9c17c127 100644 > --- a/Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst > +++ b/Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst > @@ -320,6 +320,7 @@ Code Seq# Include File > Comments > > <mailto:[email protected]> > 0xA3 90-9F linux/dtlk.h > 0xA4 00-1F uapi/linux/tee.h Generic > TEE subsystem > +0xA4 00-1F uapi/asm/sgx.h Intel > SGX subsystem (a legit conflict as TEE and SGX do not co-exist) > 0xAA 00-3F linux/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h > 0xAB 00-1F linux/nbd.h > 0xAC 00-1F linux/raw.h > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sgx.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sgx.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..c45eeed68144 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sgx.h > @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause) WITH > Linux-syscall-note */ checkpatch is bitching for some reason, I guess it doesn't like the "WITH" thing or so: WARNING: 'SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause) WITH Linux-syscall-note */' is not supported in LICENSES/... #98: FILE: arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sgx.h:1: +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause) WITH Linux-syscall-note */ WARNING: 'SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause WITH Linux-syscall-note */' is not supported in LICENSES/... #159: FILE: arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sgx_errno.h:1: +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause WITH Linux-syscall-note */ And building this fails: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c: In function ‘sgx_mmu_notifier_release’: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c:77:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mmu_notifier_unregister_no_release’; did you mean ‘mmu_notifier_unregister’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] mmu_notifier_unregister_no_release(mn, mm); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mmu_notifier_unregister arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c:78:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mmu_notifier_call_srcu’; did you mean ‘mmu_notifier_release’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] mmu_notifier_call_srcu(&encl_mm->rcu, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mmu_notifier_release cc1: some warnings being treated as errors make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:265: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.o] Error 1 make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:509: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx] Error 2 make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:509: arch/x86/kernel/cpu] Error 2 make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:509: arch/x86/kernel] Error 2 make: *** [Makefile:1670: arch/x86] Error 2 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... Got a fixed version which I can review instead? Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
