Hi, Marco > On 19-10-08 00:48, Anson Huang wrote: > > Hi, Marco > > > > > On 19-10-07 09:15, Anson Huang wrote: > > > > The SCU firmware does NOT always have return value stored in > > > > message header's function element even the API has response data, > > > > those special APIs are defined as void function in SCU firmware, > > > > so they should be treated as return success always. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <anson.hu...@nxp.com> > > > > --- > > > > Changes since V1: > > > > - Use direct API check instead of calling another function to > > > > check. > > > > - This patch is based on > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > > > > patc > > > > > > > > hwork.kernel.org%2Fpatch%2F11129553%2F&data=02%7C01%7Canson. > > > huang% > > > > > > > > 40nxp.com%7C2de0a6be69b74cc249ad08d74afc9730%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6f > > > a92cd99 > > > > > > > > c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637060321046247040&sdata=RMFAdLKGKb6 > > > mEdhycrzHX > > > > R03E6Qr5pWyRc8Zk6ErlBc%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > Thanks for this v2. It would be good to change the callers within this > series. > > > > NOT quite understand your point, the callers does NOT need to be > > changed, those > > 2 special APIs callers are already following the right way of calling the > > APIs. > > Ah okay. I searched the 5.4-rc2 tag and found the soc_uid_show() as only > user but this user sets the have_resp field to false. Is this intended?
I already fixed it and patch applied by Shawn, see below: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11129497/ Anson