The sirfsoc_usp and sirfsoc_uart objects are not
used outside of the drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.o
so make them static. Fixes following sparse warnings:
drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.h:123:30: warning: symbol 'sirfsoc_usp' was not
declared. Should it be static?
drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.h:189:30: warning: symbol 'sirfsoc_uart' was
not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.do...@codethink.co.uk>
---
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jsl...@suse.com>
Cc: Barry Song <bao...@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.h | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.h
b/drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.h
index 004ca684d3ae..637b09d3fe79 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.h
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.h
@@ -120,7 +120,8 @@ static u32 uart_usp_ff_empty_mask(struct uart_port *port)
empty_bit = ilog2(port->fifosize) + 1;
return (1 << empty_bit);
}
-struct sirfsoc_uart_register sirfsoc_usp = {
+
+static struct sirfsoc_uart_register sirfsoc_usp = {
.uart_reg = {
.sirfsoc_mode1 = 0x0000,
.sirfsoc_mode2 = 0x0004,
@@ -186,7 +187,7 @@ struct sirfsoc_uart_register sirfsoc_usp = {
},
};
-struct sirfsoc_uart_register sirfsoc_uart = {
+static struct sirfsoc_uart_register sirfsoc_uart = {
.uart_reg = {
.sirfsoc_line_ctrl = 0x0040,
.sirfsoc_tx_rx_en = 0x004c,
--
2.23.0
