On Tuesday, August 6, 2019 6:24:39 AM CEST Daniel Black wrote:
> ACPI-6.3 corresponds to when hmat revision was bumped from
> 1 to 2. In this version ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID was
> deprecated and made reserved.
>
> As such in revision 2+ we shouldn't be testing this flag.
>
> This is as per ACPI-6.3, 5.2.27.3, Table 5-145
> "Memory Proximity Domain Attributes Structure"
> for Flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Black <dan...@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c b/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c
> index 96b7d39a97c6..e938e34673d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c
> @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int __init hmat_parse_proximity_domain(union
> acpi_subtable_headers *heade
> pr_info("HMAT: Memory Flags:%04x Processor Domain:%d Memory
> Domain:%d\n",
> p->flags, p->processor_PD, p->memory_PD);
>
> - if (p->flags & ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID) {
> + if (p->flags & ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID && hmat_revision == 1) {
> target = find_mem_target(p->memory_PD);
> if (!target) {
> pr_debug("HMAT: Memory Domain missing from SRAT\n");
>
Applied as a fix for 5.4, thanks!
