On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 15:46 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > In preparation for switching to a standard sizeof_member() macro to find the > size of a member of a struct, remove the custom SIZEOF_FIELD() macro and use > the more common FIELD_SIZEOF() instead. Later patches will globally replace > FIELD_SIZEOF() and sizeof_field() with the more accurate sizeof_member().
Is the intent to have a single treewide flag day conversion of FIELD_SIZEOF -> sizeof_member or submit individual patches to subsystem maintainers? I don't recall Linus buying in to either mechanism.
