On 10/14/2019 11:32 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 03:04:57PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
It would be useful to support sorting for all blocks by the
sampled cycles percent per block. This is useful to concentrate
on the globally busiest/slowest blocks.

This patch series implements a new sort option "total_cycles" which
sorts all blocks by 'Sampled Cycles%'. The 'Sampled Cycles%' is
block sampled cycles aggregation / total sampled cycles

For example,

perf record -b ./div
perf report -s total_cycles --stdio

  # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only 
options.
  #
  #
  # Total Lost Samples: 0
  #
  # Samples: 2M of event 'cycles'
  # Event count (approx.): 2753248
  #
  # Sampled Cycles%  Sampled Cycles  Avg Cycles%  Avg Cycles                    
                          [Program Block Range]         Shared Object
  # ...............  ..............  ...........  ..........  
.................................................................  
....................
  #
             26.04%            2.8M        0.40%          18                       
                      [div.c:42 -> div.c:39]                   div
             15.17%            1.2M        0.16%           7                       
          [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380]          libc-2.27.so
              5.11%          402.0K        0.04%           2                       
                      [div.c:27 -> div.c:28]                   div
              4.87%          381.6K        0.04%           2                       
              [random.c:288 -> random.c:291]          libc-2.27.so
              4.53%          381.0K        0.04%           2                       
                      [div.c:40 -> div.c:40]                   div
              3.85%          300.9K        0.02%           1                       
                      [div.c:22 -> div.c:25]                   div
              3.08%          241.1K        0.02%           1                       
                    [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27]          libc-2.27.so
              3.06%          240.0K        0.02%           1                       
              [random.c:291 -> random.c:291]          libc-2.27.so
              2.78%          215.7K        0.02%           1                       
              [random.c:298 -> random.c:298]          libc-2.27.so
              2.52%          198.3K        0.02%           1                       
              [random.c:293 -> random.c:293]          libc-2.27.so
              2.36%          184.8K        0.02%           1                       
                    [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28]          libc-2.27.so
              2.33%          180.5K        0.02%           1                       
              [random.c:295 -> random.c:295]          libc-2.27.so
              2.28%          176.7K        0.02%           1                       
              [random.c:295 -> random.c:295]          libc-2.27.so
              2.20%          168.8K        0.02%           1                       
                  [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0]                   div
              1.98%          158.2K        0.02%           1                       
          [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388]          libc-2.27.so
              1.57%          123.3K        0.02%           1                       
                      [div.c:42 -> div.c:44]                   div
              1.44%          116.0K        0.42%          19                       
          [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394]          libc-2.27.so
  ......

This patch series supports both stdio and tui. And also with the supporting
of --percent-limit.

Jin Yao (5):
   perf util: Create new block.h/block.c for block related functions
   perf util: Count the total cycles of all samples
   perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for stdio
   perf report: Support --percent-limit for total_cycles
   perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for tui

sry for delay, but I can no longer apply this
could you please rebase?

thanks,
jirka


Hi Jiri,

Thanks a lot for reviewing the patch. I just sent out the v2 which had been rebased to perf/core branch.

Thanks
Jin Yao

Reply via email to