On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 06:37:54AM +0000, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/15/19 7:57 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:04:28PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> >> From: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>
> >>
> >> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c:783:9-10: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function
> >> 'is_protocol_err' with return type bool
> >>
> >> Return statements in functions returning bool should use
> >> true/false instead of 1/0.
> >> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/boolreturn.cocci
> >>
> >> Fixes: 46946163ac61 ("can: m_can: add support for handling arbitration
> >> error")
> >> CC: Pankaj Sharma <pankj.sha...@samsung.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> url:
> >> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Pankaj-Sharma/can-m_can-add-support-for-handling-arbitration-error/20191014-193532
> >>
> >> m_can.c | 4 ++--
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
> >> @@ -780,9 +780,9 @@ static inline bool is_lec_err(u32 psr)
> >> static inline bool is_protocol_err(u32 irqstatus)
> >> {
> >> if (irqstatus & IR_ERR_LEC_31X)
> >> - return 1;
> >> + return true;
> >> else
> >> - return 0;
> >> + return false;
> >> }
> >>
> >> static int m_can_handle_protocol_error(struct net_device *dev, u32
> >> irqstatus)
> >>
> > <2c>
> > Perhaps the following is a nicer way to express this (completely untested):
> >
> > return !!(irqstatus & IR_ERR_LEC_31X);
> > </2c>
>
>
> Really...., !! for bool / _Bool types? why not simply:
>
> static inline bool is_protocol_err(u32 irqstatus)
> return irqstatus & IR_ERR_LEC_31X;
> }
Good point, silly me.
