On 15/10/2019 12:56, Quentin Perret wrote: > Hmm, a problem here is that static_branch*() can block (it uses a > mutex) while you're in the rcu section, I think. > > I suppose you could just move this above rcu_read_lock() and use > rcu_access_pointer() instead ? >
Right, I got confused again, the only problem is with the rcu_read_lock(), so the increment is fine but the decrement isn't. Let me try this again with more coffee. > Thanks, > Quentin >
