On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:43:50PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Here is another cleanup on top of Jan's set. Comments?
>
>
> The name path_put_conditional (formerly, dput_path) is a little unclear.
> Replace (path_put_conditional + path_put) with path_walk_put_both,
> "put a pair of paths after a path_walk" (see the kerneldoc).
I think this function is a good idea. The name seems odd to me, but
I don't really have a better idea either.
> +static void path_walk_put_both(struct path *path1, struct path *path2)
> +{
> + dput(path1->dentry);
> + dput(path2->dentry);
> + mntput(path1->mnt);
> + if (path1->mnt != path2->mnt)
> + mntput(path2->mnt);
> }
Why do you opencode the path_put for path1?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
