Hi Ingo,
I finally found the bug that causes tst-robust8 from the glibc to fail
on s390x. Turned out to be a common code problem with the processing of
the robust futex list. The patch below fixes the bug for me.

-- 
blue skies,
  Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
Subject: [PATCH] robust futex thread exit race

From: Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Calling handle_futex_death in exit_robust_list for the different
robust mutexes of a thread basically frees the mutex. Another
thread might grab the lock immediately which updates the next
pointer of the mutex. fetch_robust_entry over the next pointer
might therefore branch into the robust mutex list of a different
thread. This can cause two problems: 1) some mutexes held by
the dead thread are not getting freed and 2) some mutexs held by
a different thread are freed.
The next point need to be read before calling handle_futex_death.

Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

diff -urpN linux-2.6/kernel/futex.c linux-2.6-patched/kernel/futex.c
--- linux-2.6/kernel/futex.c    2007-08-23 11:14:33.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6-patched/kernel/futex.c    2007-09-30 16:31:57.000000000 +0200
@@ -1943,9 +1943,10 @@ static inline int fetch_robust_entry(str
 void exit_robust_list(struct task_struct *curr)
 {
        struct robust_list_head __user *head = curr->robust_list;
-       struct robust_list __user *entry, *pending;
-       unsigned int limit = ROBUST_LIST_LIMIT, pi, pip;
+       struct robust_list __user *entry, *next_entry, *pending;
+       unsigned int limit = ROBUST_LIST_LIMIT, pi, next_pi, pip;
        unsigned long futex_offset;
+       int rc;
 
        /*
         * Fetch the list head (which was registered earlier, via
@@ -1965,12 +1966,13 @@ void exit_robust_list(struct task_struct
        if (fetch_robust_entry(&pending, &head->list_op_pending, &pip))
                return;
 
-       if (pending)
-               handle_futex_death((void __user *)pending + futex_offset,
-                                  curr, pip);
-
        while (entry != &head->list) {
                /*
+                * Fetch the next entry in the list before calling
+                * handle_futex_death:
+                */
+               rc = fetch_robust_entry(&next_entry, &entry->next, &next_pi);
+               /*
                 * A pending lock might already be on the list, so
                 * don't process it twice:
                 */
@@ -1978,11 +1980,10 @@ void exit_robust_list(struct task_struct
                        if (handle_futex_death((void __user *)entry + 
futex_offset,
                                                curr, pi))
                                return;
-               /*
-                * Fetch the next entry in the list:
-                */
-               if (fetch_robust_entry(&entry, &entry->next, &pi))
+               if (rc)
                        return;
+               entry = next_entry;
+               pi = next_pi;
                /*
                 * Avoid excessively long or circular lists:
                 */
@@ -1991,6 +1992,10 @@ void exit_robust_list(struct task_struct
 
                cond_resched();
        }
+
+       if (pending)
+               handle_futex_death((void __user *)pending + futex_offset,
+                                  curr, pip);
 }
 
 long do_futex(u32 __user *uaddr, int op, u32 val, ktime_t *timeout,


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to