[PATCH v2 17/33] oprofile: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning

[Kefeng Wang]

As said in commit f2c2cbcc35d4 ("powerpc: Use pr_warn instead of
pr_warning"), removing pr_warning so all logging messages use a
consistent <prefix>_warn style. Let's do it.

Cc: Robert Richter <r...@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Robert Richter <r...@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhat...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.w...@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/oprofile/oprofile_perf.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/oprofile/oprofile_perf.c b/drivers/oprofile/oprofile_perf.c
index 4b150a754890..98a63a5f8763 100644
--- a/drivers/oprofile/oprofile_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/oprofile/oprofile_perf.c
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ static void op_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event,
        if (id != num_counters)
                oprofile_add_sample(regs, id);
        else
-               pr_warning("oprofile: ignoring spurious overflow "
-                               "on cpu %u\n", cpu);
+               pr_warn("oprofile: ignoring spurious overflow on cpu %u\n",
+                       cpu);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ static int op_create_counter(int cpu, int event)
 
        if (pevent->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE) {
                perf_event_release_kernel(pevent);
-               pr_warning("oprofile: failed to enable event %d "
-                               "on CPU %d\n", event, cpu);
+               pr_warn("oprofile: failed to enable event %d on CPU %d\n",
+                       event, cpu);
                return -EBUSY;
        }
 
-- 
2.20.1