On 18-10-19, 10:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:03 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > On 18-10-19, 09:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Well, the policy is going away, so the governor has been stopped for > > > it already. Even if the limit is updated, it will not be used anyway, > > > so why bother with updating it? > > > > The hardware will be programmed to run on that frequency before the > > policy exits, > > How exactly? > > The policy is inactive, so refresh_frequency_limits() won't even run > cpufreq_set_policy() for it.
Ahh, yes. We won't change the frequency, this is all useless in that case. -- viresh