On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > > > I had a similar situation except I was more interested in the performance > > difference. Went from ~4MB/s with the 430HX controller to ~12.5MB/s with > > the promise. This on an old Pentium system. > > The network is 10 mbit, so 4 MB/sec is no good in this case. > I've got the thing running, with (ibm)setmax. Don't hang the disk in a > machine that does handle > 32 GB, because it will screw the limit the > setmax just set. If your network is 10 megaBIT, then 4 megaBYTES a second is sufficient to saturate your network. 10Mbit maxes around 1.1Mbyte half duplex, or so. Hell, my little server at home has a bunch of old SCSI-2 disks...they do a whopping 120kbytes a second! Brad Hartin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Matthias Andree
- Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Eric Lammerts
- Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Tommi Virtanen
- RE: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Torrey Hoffman
- RE: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Tim Wright
- Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Brad Hartin
- Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Andries . Brouwer
- Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Andries . Brouwer
- Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Andries . Brouwer
- Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Andries . Brouwer
- Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Andries . Brouwer
- Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Igmar Palsenberg