Em Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 03:42:39PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 7/10/19 3:06 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > On 7/10/19 2:20 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 11:31:20AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> >>
> >> SNIP
> >>
> >>> u8 pad[8] = {0};
> >>>
> >>> - if (!perf_data__is_pipe(data) && !perf_data__is_dir(data)) {
> >>> + if (!perf_data__is_pipe(data) && perf_data__is_single_file(data)) {
> >>> off_t file_offset;
> >>> int fd = perf_data__fd(data);
> >>> int err;
> >>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/data.c b/tools/perf/util/data.c
> >>> index df173f0bf654..964ea101dba6 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/perf/util/data.c
> >>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/data.c
> >>> @@ -76,6 +76,13 @@ int perf_data__open_dir(struct perf_data *data)
> >>> DIR *dir;
> >>> int nr = 0;
> >>>
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * Directory containing a single regular perf data file which is already
> >>> + * open, means there is nothing more to do here.
> >>> + */
> >>> + if (perf_data__is_single_file(data))
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +
> >>
> >> cool, I like this approach much more than the previous flag
> >
> > Yes it is much nicer. Thanks for your direction on that.
> >
> >>
> >> any change you (if there's repost) or Arnaldo
> >> could squeeze in indent change below?
> >
> > Sent a patch, to be applied before these.
> >
>
> That is:
>
> "[PATCH] perf session: Fix indent in perf_session__new()"
>
> Any comments on this patch set Arnaldo?
I'll take a look at it later, I think Jiri is ok with it already?
- Arnaldo
