On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 04:33:24PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > Correct typo in comment: s/suck/stuck. > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo....@linaro.org> > --- > tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c > index 166f411568a5..415903b48578 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c > @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ bool test__bp_signal_is_supported(void) > * breakpointed instruction. > * > * Since arm64 has the same issue with arm for the single-step > - * handling, this case also gets suck on the breakpointed > + * handling, this case also gets stuck on the breakpointed > * instruction. > * > * Just disable the test for these architectures until these
Thanks, and sorry for only spotting this after the offending patch was merged. Will
