I'd like to know (I know, I'm being slightly off topic, while still
staying on topic, so I'm on topic...er...yes) if there is any
advantage, be it memory-wise or architectuarally wise, to use modules?
I already know the obvious points of if you are creating a distro that
it is usually good to make a very modular kernel for those wishing not
to recompile their kernel, but I was wondering if there were any other
advantages to using modules vs. making a monolithic kernel for a
kernel to be used only on one machine (with no other hardware support
at all)?
Thanks, and sorry if I'm being slightly off topic...
Kernels are fun! I wish I could learn more!
--
+----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| Evan Thompson | POWERED BY: |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Linux cd168990-a 2.4.0-ac2 #1 Fri |
| Freelance Computer Nerd | Jan 5 11:58:30 CST 2001 i686 |
| http://evaner.penguinpowered.com | unknown |
+----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/