On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:37:03AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 02 Oct 2007 08:18:17 +0200 Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The clockevents patches are not included in this; but given the > > > recent trouble i'm not 100% sure they are even ready yet. > > i'm curious, which "recent trouble" do you refer to? (The NMI watchdog > bug [which is off by default] was fixed quickly. The C1E bug was found > and fixed quickly. Anything else i missed?)
C1e and now the misrouted irq 0s Thomas reported. Also i'm a little worried about the missing C1e check; it looks like it needs a re-review to make sure not other infrastructure was missing. > > > hm, well, I hope you and Thomas are on the same page regarding > > precisely what the remaining issues are. > > i'd like to see the 64-bit clockevents (& dynticks) patches merged. > Demand from users and distros is high. I'm aware of that. No argument on that it will eventually go in. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
