On Tue, 2019-10-22 at 17:18 -0700, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Add a new ima hook to measure keys added to builtin_trusted_keys
> keyring.

There is no IMA hook in this patch.

> 
> Updated ima_match_rules function to handle the new ima hook.
> This is used to determine if ima policy requires measurement
> of keys added to builtin_trusted_keys keyring.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nra...@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy | 1 +
>  security/integrity/ima/ima.h         | 1 +
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c     | 1 +
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c  | 5 ++++-
>  4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy 
> b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
> index fc376a323908..25566c74e679 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ Description:
>                               [FIRMWARE_CHECK]
>                               [KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK] [KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK]
>                               [KEXEC_CMDLINE]
> +                             [BUILTIN_TRUSTED_KEYS]
>                       mask:= [[^]MAY_READ] [[^]MAY_WRITE] [[^]MAY_APPEND]
>                              [[^]MAY_EXEC]
>                       fsmagic:= hex value
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> index b6847ee1f47a..0d2908036882 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> @@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ static inline unsigned long ima_hash_key(u8 *digest)
>       hook(KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK)     \
>       hook(POLICY_CHECK)              \
>       hook(KEXEC_CMDLINE)             \
> +     hook(BUILTIN_TRUSTED_KEYS)      \
>       hook(MAX_CHECK)
>  #define __ima_hook_enumify(ENUM)     ENUM,
>  
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c 
> b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
> index f614e22bf39f..cc04706b7e7a 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned 
> char *filename,
>   *   subj,obj, and type: are LSM specific.
>   *   func: FILE_CHECK | BPRM_CHECK | CREDS_CHECK | MMAP_CHECK | MODULE_CHECK
>   *   | KEXEC_CMDLINE
> + *   | BUILTIN_TRUSTED_KEYS
>   *   mask: contains the permission mask
>   *   fsmagic: hex value
>   *
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c 
> b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index 6df7f641ff66..944636076152 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, 
> struct inode *inode,
>  {
>       int i;
>  
> -     if (func == KEXEC_CMDLINE) {
> +     if ((func == KEXEC_CMDLINE) || (func == BUILTIN_TRUSTED_KEYS)) {
>               if ((rule->flags & IMA_FUNC) && (rule->func == func))
>                       return true;
>               return false;
> @@ -959,6 +959,9 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct 
> ima_rule_entry *entry)
>                               entry->func = POLICY_CHECK;
>                       else if (strcmp(args[0].from, "KEXEC_CMDLINE") == 0)
>                               entry->func = KEXEC_CMDLINE;
> +                     else if (strcmp(args[0].from,
> +                                     "BUILTIN_TRUSTED_KEYS") == 0)
> +                             entry->func = BUILTIN_TRUSTED_KEYS;
>                       else
>                               result = -EINVAL;
>                       if (!result)

Any new options need to be displayed as well.

Mimi

Reply via email to