From: Xiyu Yang <xiyuyan...@fudan.edu.cn>

[ Upstream commit d03f228470a8c0a22b774d1f8d47071e0de4f6dd ]

nr_add_node() invokes nr_neigh_get_dev(), which returns a local
reference of the nr_neigh object to "nr_neigh" with increased refcnt.

When nr_add_node() returns, "nr_neigh" becomes invalid, so the refcount
should be decreased to keep refcount balanced.

The issue happens in one normal path of nr_add_node(), which forgets to
decrease the refcnt increased by nr_neigh_get_dev() and causes a refcnt
leak. It should decrease the refcnt before the function returns like
other normal paths do.

Fix this issue by calling nr_neigh_put() before the nr_add_node()
returns.

Signed-off-by: Xiyu Yang <xiyuyan...@fudan.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Xin Tan <tanxin....@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/netrom/nr_route.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/net/netrom/nr_route.c
+++ b/net/netrom/nr_route.c
@@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25
                /* refcount initialized at 1 */
                spin_unlock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock);
 
+               nr_neigh_put(nr_neigh);
                return 0;
        }
        nr_node_lock(nr_node);


Reply via email to