On 28/04/2020 20:23, Saravana Kannan wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:02 AM Daniel Lezcano > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Hi Saravana, > > You were replying to Sandeep :)
Oh, right :) Sorry Sandeep. Thanks for taking the time to elaborate a clear statement of the GKI. [ ... ] >> That was my understanding of the GKI, thanks for confirming. >> >> Putting apart the non-technical aspect of these changes, the benefit I >> see is the memory usage optimization regarding the single kernel image. >> >> With the ARM64 defconfig, multiple platforms and their corresponding >> drivers are compiled-in. It results in a big kernel image which fails to >> load because of overlapping on DT load address (or something else). When >> that is detected, it is fine to adjust the load addresses, otherwise it >> is painful to narrow down the root cause. >> >> In order to prevent this, we have to customize the defconfig each >> version release. > > Sorry, I'm not sure I understand where you are going with this. Are > you agreeing to pick up this change? Right. I agree with the change but I would like to have Thomas opinion on this before picking the patch. Thomas ? -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
