On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 12:58:26PM +0200, Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > On 03/10/2007, Dmitry Adamushko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 03/10/2007, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I can't see anything about clearing. I think, this was about charging, > > > which should change the key enough, to move a task to, maybe, a better > > > place in a que (tree) than with current ways. > > > > just a quick patch, not tested and I've not evaluated all possible > > implications yet. > > But someone might give it a try with his/(her -- are even more > > welcomed :-) favourite sched_yield() load. > > > > (and white space damaged) > > > > --- sched_fair-old.c 2007-10-03 12:45:17.010306000 +0200 > > +++ sched_fair.c 2007-10-03 12:44:46.899851000 +0200 ... > s/curr/se
Thanks very much! Alas, I'll be able to look at this and try only in the evening. Best regards, Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
