On 30-04-20, 17:36, Mathias Nyman wrote: > On 30.4.2020 13.10, Vinod Koul wrote: > > From: Christian Lamparter <chunk...@googlemail.com> > > > > This add a new driver for renesas xhci which is basically a firmware > > loader for uPD720201 and uPD720202 w/o ROM. It uses xhci-pci driver for > > most of the work. > > > > This is added in Makefile before the xhci-pci driver so that it first > > get probed for renesas devices before the xhci-pci driver has a chance > > to claim any device. > > Most of the above is no longer correct
Yes that is correct now, this para need to go. > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/Makefile b/drivers/usb/host/Makefile > > index b191361257cc..c3a79f626393 100644 > > --- a/drivers/usb/host/Makefile > > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/Makefile > > @@ -70,7 +70,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD_DAVINCI) += ohci-da8xx.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_USB_UHCI_HCD) += uhci-hcd.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_USB_FHCI_HCD) += fhci.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD) += xhci-hcd.o > > -obj-$(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_PCI) += xhci-pci.o > > +usb-xhci-pci-objs := xhci-pci.o xhci-pci-renesas.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_PCI) += usb-xhci-pci.o > > I don't think it's a good idea to rename the xhci-pci module to usb-xhci-pci > > does > > xhci-pci-y := xhci-pci.o xhci-pci-renesas.o > obj-$(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_PCI) += xhci-pci.o > > cause some kbuild issues? Yes with this version I get the warning: make[4]: Circular drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.o <- drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.o dependency dropped. I don't speak enough Kbuild, but I guess it does make sense that we have xhci-pci.o as target for both xhci-pci.o xhci-pci-renesas.o! That was the reason for adding usb tag to this to resolve the conflict. I am okay for any other mechanism which can work well here. Btw what issues do you foresee with adding usb tag to module name. -- ~Vinod
