On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:32:56PM -0700, Jonathan Bakker wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On 2020-04-28 3:20 a.m., Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:35:57AM -0700, Jonathan Bakker wrote:
> >> Add support for following devices:
> >>   - touchkeys connected over i2c-gpio
> >>   - s6e63m0 panel connected over spi-gpio
> >>   - fsa9480 microusb switch over i2c-gpio
> >>   - wm8994 over i2c-gpio (no machine driver yet)
> >>   - all common i2c-gpio devices
> > 
> > Please split it per functionality, e.g.:
> > 1. Add sound,
> > 2. Add panel,
> > 3. Add touchkeys (unless part of panel),
> > 4. The remaining i2c-gpio devices without bindings could go as one.
> 
> Ok, will do.
> 
> > 
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bakker <xc-rac...@live.ca>
> >> Signed-off-by: Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chm...@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-aries.dtsi      | 282 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-fascinate4g.dts |   6 +
> >>  2 files changed, 270 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-aries.dtsi 
> >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-aries.dtsi
> >> index f83df426f2b6..ef966d13d83d 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-aries.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-aries.dtsi
> >> @@ -12,8 +12,14 @@
> >>    compatible = "samsung,aries", "samsung,s5pv210";
> >>  
> >>    aliases {
> >> +          i2c4 = &i2c_sound;
> >> +          i2c5 = &i2c_accel;
> >>            i2c6 = &i2c_pmic;
> >> +          i2c7 = &i2c_musb;
> >>            i2c9 = &i2c_fuel;
> >> +          i2c10 = &i2c_touchkey;
> >> +          i2c11 = &i2c_prox;
> >> +          i2c12 = &i2c_magnetometer;
> >>    };
> >>  
> >>    memory@30000000 {
> >> @@ -48,6 +54,18 @@
> >>            gpio = <&gpj1 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >>    };
> >>  
> >> +  touchkey_vdd: regulator-fixed-1 {
> >> +          compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> >> +          regulator-name = "VTOUCH_3.3V";
> >> +          regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> >> +          regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> >> +          enable-active-high;
> >> +          gpio = <&gpj3 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >> +
> >> +          pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> +          pinctrl-0 = <&touchkey_vdd_ena>;
> >> +  };
> >> +
> >>    wifi_pwrseq: wifi-pwrseq {
> >>            compatible = "mmc-pwrseq-simple";
> >>            reset-gpios = <&gpg1 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> >> @@ -57,7 +75,69 @@
> >>            power-off-delay-us = <500>;
> >>    };
> >>  
> >> -  i2c_pmic: i2c-gpio-0 {
> >> +  i2c_sound: i2c-gpio-0 {
> >> +          compatible = "i2c-gpio";
> >> +          sda-gpios = <&mp05 3 (GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN)>;
> >> +          scl-gpios = <&mp05 2 (GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN)>;
> >> +          i2c-gpio,delay-us = <2>;
> >> +          #address-cells = <1>;
> >> +          #size-cells = <0>;
> >> +
> >> +          pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> +          pinctrl-0 = <&sound_i2c_pins>;
> >> +
> >> +          wm8994: wm8994@1a {
> >> +                  compatible = "wlf,wm8994";
> >> +                  reg = <0x1a>;
> >> +
> >> +                  #sound-dai-cells = <0>;
> >> +
> >> +                  gpio-controller;
> >> +                  #gpio-cells = <2>;
> >> +
> >> +                  clocks = <&clocks MOUT_CLKOUT>;
> >> +                  clock-names = "MCLK1";
> >> +
> >> +                  AVDD2-supply = <&buck3_reg>;
> >> +                  DBVDD-supply = <&buck3_reg>;
> > 
> > No such supply, check the bindings.
> > 
> 
> Well, it may not be in the bindings, but the driver definitely requires it :) 
> See drivers/mfd/wm8994-core.c
> 
> What's the best way of dealing with this situation?

I'll send a patch fixing the bindings. However don't you miss the
AVDD1-supply in such case? Driver should report error.

> 
> >> +                  CPVDD-supply = <&buck3_reg>;
> >> +                  SPKVDD1-supply = <&buck3_reg>;
> >> +                  SPKVDD2-supply = <&buck3_reg>;
> >> +
> >> +                  wlf,gpio-cfg = <0xa101 0x8100 0x0100 0x0100 0x8100
> >> +                                  0xa101 0x0100 0x8100 0x0100 0x0100
> >> +                                  0x0100>;
> >> +
> >> +                  wlf,ldo1ena = <&gpf3 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >> +                  wlf,ldo2ena = <&gpf3 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >> +
> >> +                  wlf,lineout1-se;
> >> +                  wlf,lineout2-se;
> >> +
> >> +                  assigned-clocks = <&clocks MOUT_CLKOUT>;
> >> +                  assigned-clock-rates = <0>;
> >> +                  assigned-clock-parents = <&xusbxti>;
> >> +
> >> +                  pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> +                  pinctrl-0 = <&codec_ldo>;
> >> +          };
> >> +  };
> >> +
> >> +  i2c_accel: i2c-gpio-1 {
> >> +          compatible = "i2c-gpio";
> >> +          sda-gpios = <&gpj3 6 (GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN)>;
> >> +          scl-gpios = <&gpj3 7 (GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN)>;
> >> +          i2c-gpio,delay-us = <2>;
> >> +          #address-cells = <1>;
> >> +          #size-cells = <0>;
> >> +
> >> +          pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> +          pinctrl-0 = <&accel_i2c_pins>;
> >> +
> >> +          /* bma023 accelerometer, no mainline binding */
> > 
> > status disabled ... unless you need it for user-space I2C tools?
> > 
> 
> Nope, but wanted to add them all in due to adding the si4709 in galaxys.  I 
> was having
> issues with accidentally overwriting previously named nodes (ie having 
> i2c-gpio-0 in
> both the common dtsi and the device specific dts) so I wanted to get the 
> numbers
> nailed down.

So add them with status disabled. This will document the HW without
enabling empty I2C GPIO bus.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Reply via email to