On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:22 AM Tejun Heo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Looks fine to me too. I don't quite understand the usecase tho. It looks > like all it's being used for is to tag some kthreads as belonging to the > same group. Can't that be done with kthread_data()?
I _think_ Bruce wants the signal handling unification too, because
nfsd wants to react to being shut down with signals.
But you're right, more explanation of why nfsd wants/needs a separate
grouping is a good idea.
Linus
