ID_DFR0 based TraceFilt feature should not be exposed to guests. Hence lets
drop it.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <m...@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.mo...@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poul...@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poul...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khand...@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 6d032fbe416f..51386dade423 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -435,7 +435,6 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr1[] = {
};
static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_dfr0[] = {
- ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 28, 4, 0),
S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 24, 4, 0xf),
/* PerfMon */
ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 20, 4, 0),
ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 16, 4, 0),
--
2.20.1
