On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:06:32 +0200 Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04 2007, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > > > Huh? Isn't the block layer supposed to fill in the entire thing? > > (i.e. current contents shouldn't matter) > > Yeah, but sg chaining requires that ->page be filled in properly or it > could confuse it. I think I'll add some debugging to catch that. > I assume sg_init_one() still can work on an uninitialized sg entry? Rgds Pierre
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
