On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:25 AM Song Liu <songliubrav...@fb.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 5, 2020, at 7:07 AM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
> >
> > The newly added bpf_stats_handler function has the wrong #ifdef
> > check around it, leading to an unused-function warning when
> > CONFIG_SYSCTL is disabled:
> >
> > kernel/sysctl.c:205:12: error: unused function 'bpf_stats_handler'
> > [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
> > static int bpf_stats_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> >
> > Fix the check to match the reference.
> >
> > Fixes: d46edd671a14 ("bpf: Sharing bpf runtime stats with BPF_ENABLE_STATS")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
>
> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubrav...@fb.com>
>
> Thanks for the fix!
Applied to bpf-next.
Arnd, please make sure subject includes target tree like [PATCH
bpf-next] in the future.
Thanks
