Thanks for pushing this change.
I'm fine with this change as it is attempting to change only the last
occurrence of the (IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR combination.
But, this code was initially written with PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() itself but
later changed to use (IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR based on the review comment
from Dmitry Osipenko ( https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/20/1457 )
Adding Dmitry as well to review the change.
I'm fine with this change.
Reviewed-by: Vidya Sagar <vid...@nvidia.com>
On 05-May-20 8:30 PM, Aishwarya Ramakrishnan wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO contains if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR.
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/ptr_ret.cocci
Signed-off-by: Aishwarya Ramakrishnan <aishwaryarj...@gmail.com>
---
drivers/phy/tegra/phy-tegra194-p2u.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/tegra/phy-tegra194-p2u.c
b/drivers/phy/tegra/phy-tegra194-p2u.c
index 7042bed9feaa..42394d27f4cb 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/tegra/phy-tegra194-p2u.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/tegra/phy-tegra194-p2u.c
@@ -92,10 +92,7 @@ static int tegra_p2u_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
phy_set_drvdata(generic_phy, phy);
phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate);
- if (IS_ERR(phy_provider))
- return PTR_ERR(phy_provider);
-
- return 0;
+ return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider);
}
static const struct of_device_id tegra_p2u_id_table[] = {
--
2.17.1
