On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 12:54:17PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > Matt Mackall wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 06:20:43PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > >> Just make the __pid_nr() etc functions that expect the argument > >> to always be not NULL. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> static inline pid_t pid_nr(struct pid *pid) > >> { > >> pid_t nr = 0; > >> if (pid) > >> - nr = pid->numbers[0].nr; > >> + nr = __pid_nr(pid); > >> return nr; > >> } > > > > Is there a patch that removes these inlines? Otherwise this looks good > > to me. > > Not yet. Some of are uninlined already, but others are not. I'd like > to make some testing before uninline them.
I was asking about the whole function, actually, not the keyword. Is this function not equivalent to __pid_nr now? -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/