On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 03:35:02PM -0500, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nobody with working brain would read it completely into memory. Instead everybody with a working brain would introduce another hashing layer for every block access? I don't think the reiserfs code (e.g.) would cope with yte another compliation in the code ;) -- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean ... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing uncl... Stefan Traby
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing ... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allo... Stefan Traby
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or ... Andreas Dilger
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or ... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing ... David Woodhouse
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allo... Marc Lehmann
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or ... Stefan Traby
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or ... Chris Mason
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or ... Marc Lehmann
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or ... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or ... Roger Gammans
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing uncl... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing ... Andreas Dilger
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allo... Alan Cox
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or ... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing ... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown? Mo McKinlay