__read_mostly can easily be misused by folks, its not meant for just read-only data. There are performance reasons for using it, but we also don't provide any guidance about its use. Provide a bit more guidance over it use.
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcg...@kernel.org> --- I sent this 2 years ago, but it fell through the cracks. This time I'm adding Andrew Morton now, the fix0r-of-falling-through-the-cracks. Resending as I just saw a patch which doesn't clearly justifiy the merits of the use of __read_mostly on it. include/linux/cache.h | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/cache.h b/include/linux/cache.h index 750621e41d1c..8106fb304fa7 100644 --- a/include/linux/cache.h +++ b/include/linux/cache.h @@ -15,8 +15,14 @@ /* * __read_mostly is used to keep rarely changing variables out of frequently - * updated cachelines. If an architecture doesn't support it, ignore the - * hint. + * updated cachelines. Its use should be reserved for data that is used + * frequently in hot paths. Performance traces can help decide when to use + * this. You want __read_mostly data to be tightly packed, so that in the + * best case multiple frequently read variables for a hot path will be next + * to each other in order to reduce the number of cachelines needed to + * execute a critial path. We should be mindful and selective of its use. + * ie: if you're going to use it please supply a *good* justification in your + * commit log */ #ifndef __read_mostly #define __read_mostly -- 2.25.1
