On 05/07, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/5/6 23:05, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 05/06, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> In f2fs_try_to_free_nids(), .nid_list_lock spinlock critical region will
> >> increase as expected shrink number increase, to avoid spining other CPUs
> >> for long time, it's better to implement like extent cache and nats
> >> shrinker.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >> v2:
> >> - fix unlock wrong spinlock.
> >>  fs/f2fs/node.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> >>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >> index 4da0d8713df5..ad0b14f4dab8 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >> @@ -2488,7 +2488,6 @@ void f2fs_alloc_nid_failed(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, 
> >> nid_t nid)
> >>  int f2fs_try_to_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
> >>  {
> >>    struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
> >> -  struct free_nid *i, *next;
> >>    int nr = nr_shrink;
> >>  
> >>    if (nm_i->nid_cnt[FREE_NID] <= MAX_FREE_NIDS)
> >> @@ -2498,14 +2497,22 @@ int f2fs_try_to_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info 
> >> *sbi, int nr_shrink)
> >>            return 0;
> >>  
> >>    spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> >> -  list_for_each_entry_safe(i, next, &nm_i->free_nid_list, list) {
> >> -          if (nr_shrink <= 0 ||
> >> -                          nm_i->nid_cnt[FREE_NID] <= MAX_FREE_NIDS)
> >> +  while (nr_shrink) {
> >> +          struct free_nid *i;
> >> +
> >> +          if (nm_i->nid_cnt[FREE_NID] <= MAX_FREE_NIDS)
> >>                    break;
> >>  
> >> +          i = list_first_entry(&nm_i->free_nid_list,
> >> +                                  struct free_nid, list);
> >> +          list_del(&i->list);
> >> +          spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> >> +
> >>            __remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID);
> > 
> > __remove_free_nid() will do list_del again. btw, how about just splitting 
> > out
> 
> Oh, my bad.
> 
> How about moving __remove_free_nid into .nid_list_lock coverage?
> 
> > given nr_shrink into multiple trials?
> 
> Like this?

Yes.

> 
>       while (shrink) {
>               batch = DEFAULT_BATCH_NUMBER; // 16
>               spinlock();
>               list_for_each_entry_safe() {
>                       if (!shrink || !batch)
>                               break;
>                       remove_item_from_list;
>                       shrink--;
>                       batch--;
>               }
>               spin_unlock();
>       }
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> >>            kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
> >>            nr_shrink--;
> >> +
> >> +          spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> >>    }
> >>    spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> >>    mutex_unlock(&nm_i->build_lock);
> >> -- 
> >> 2.18.0.rc1
> > .
> > 

Reply via email to